Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Annie-Grace Kline v. Leidos, Inc.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 25-1202 · judgment October 20, 2025
Questions presented
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Washington D.C. ANNIE-GRACE KLINE, ) Plaintiff. ) ) V. ) Case No.: TBD By The Court LEIDOS. INC.. ) Defendant. ) Petition For Writ Of Certiorari (59-60B) Questions For Review: 1. Appealing To The United States Supreme Court To: a) . Can The United States Supreme Court help Settle my Case with LEIDOS Inc.'s who have refused to compensate me after wrongfully terminating my employment? b) . Can The United States Supreme Court extend their hand of Justice and Mercy to help save my home? c) . Why has my lawsuit languished in the Courts for years without Relief and my persecution by Leidos Inc. and their Customer (AGC) continue to this day and close to losing my home? d) . Can The United States Supreme Court Remove The Time Limitations Of My Case Due To The 5 Long years of Age-discrimination, Victimization and Political Retribution at The BuckEYE-II of Leidos Inc. all of which extend for over many years? e) . Can The United States Supreme Court help uncover why Judge Brinkemma Dismiss my Case quickly at the Eastern District Court before a scheduled Hearing? fl). Can The United States Supreme Court help uncover reasons why Leidos Inc. Managers in the BuckEYE-II Department and the “Customer” AGC (Army Geo-spatial Center), targeted me (at age 61), to have short training, then Deploy me overseas to a tough site, but did not deploy younger analysts better suited for the difficult conditions at the site, and who were willing to deploy to the site? f2). Can The United States Supreme Court ask the BuckEYE II managers if I performed well for 5 years and then decide to gave me a short (5 week), training on a new Program compared to others? 13). Can The United States Supreme Court ask Leidos Inc. and Buckeye managers if I was the only
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Annie-Grace Kline
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 29 2026Rehearing DENIED.
- Jun 09 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
- May 21 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Apr 27 2026Petition DENIED.
- Apr 09 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2026.
- Nov 26 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2026)