Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Glenn Winningham v. Chad Yarbrough, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 25-10360 · judgment November 14, 2025
Questions presented
0 QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW
-
Is the 1871 municipal corporation (16 Stat. 419) a law made by Congress “respecting an establishment of religion”, and an unconstitutional violation of Article 1 in Amendment because it comes from what is now the Vatican and introduces the Pope’s Roman Canon Law into the United States of America?
-
Is the Minor Estate (31 CFR 363.6) a law made by Congress “respecting an establishment of religion”, and an unconstitutional violation of Article 1 in Amendment, because it was created by the Pope’s owned and operated Crown of England with the Cestui que vie Act of 1666, and brought into the United States with the Code of Law for the District of Columbia in 1901 at 31 Stat. 1432?
-
Is the National BAR Foundation (Title 35 USC 70501 through
-
and all of its subsidiaries in the various States a law made by Congress “respecting an establishment of religion”, and an unconstitutional violation of Article 1 in Amendment because it is bringing the Pope’s private BAR Guild (British Accredited Regency) into the United States, which originated in the Pope’s owned and operated City of London, and they are claiming Page i
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Glenn Winningham
For respondent
Jonathan R. Ellzey
Elder, Bickings & Ellzey
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 20 2026The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Apr 02 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Mar 12 2026Waiver of right of respondent Jonathan R. Ellzey to respond filed.
- Mar 09 2026Waiver of right of respondents Bill Pinkham, et al. to respond filed.
- Mar 02 2026Waiver of right of respondent State Bar of Texas to respond filed.
- Feb 27 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Nov 17 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2026)