Samuel Elliott v. United States

​Q​U ​ ESTION​ ​P​​RESENTED​ ​FOR​ ​R​E ​ VIEW​ ​Petitioner​​sought​​relief​​under​​28​​U.S.C.​​§ 2255​​on​​grounds​​of​​ineffective​ ​assistance​ ​arising​ ​from​ ​errors​ ​and​ ​omissions​ ​by​ ​counsel​ ​pertaining​ ​to​ ​both​ ​custody​ ​and​ ​a​ ​restitution​ ​amount​ ​of​ ​$730,000.00.​ ​The​ ​courts​ ​below​ ​denied​ ​the​ ​restitution-related​ ​claim​ ​on​ ​grounds​ ​that​ ​relief​ ​under​ ​§​ ​2255​ ​is​ ​not​ ​available​ ​for​ ​ineffective​ ​assistance​ ​related​ ​to​ ​restitution.​ ​Would​ ​reasonable​ ​jurists​ ​find​ ​the​ ​denial​ ​of​ ​Petitioner’s​ ​ineffective​ ​assistance​ ​claim​ ​on​ ​these​ ​grounds debatable or wrong?​ ​2​