Carlos Martinez v. California

WhcHer or not vwsf te * j w heVh tr net f Ae s’^.rioi/s h>w <JC A v ^5 'A. jjirvK^, fcdM^cdVon fh<tf Q&pofe$ F&l'* bi&Trt&r i~o a. ter-rn <?r b bt in^o 3< \tfW^€r C a liT PtTr/j iV Cade Se.^ Bon 5i/^ai v\s'i c/«5 anJ (c) 5'k(?u'/J b'C <^-5 6y {^4. of C«h'ftfrn?<a to auHijri’^e./ I n ffce c^xre o? comml HeJ after a j> < * s’ J ^e r <M s jcrfxo r c^vtyj CcKchz Hot ctjv thL of eaVer wi <xk i rvx/ m ViAi/er 5U& J» u f <al$# iko_ ti<9vi 2?f a </</» f' cnxl £'<51^£C(/fvv£ Q-fe^A'^r' no f >7 ? rn |/rri er life t^.r^ pu n\S^ no^nt^ 3t Wlit:tli£Y' jlie Fx fbfT fkctb yoe<mjf$ tb chany^ the ckAt'acter of t/?e Former J uc^h^eul'fsj tc? Iny?ore hmt’vif thai th^t owe vvi^er the. 01J h& h \ t(/a( c r f rhfn <aI stkh/lcf