Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Stacy Gene Hall v. Buddy Myotte, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-35372 · judgment July 30, 2025
Questions presented
-
Procedural Due Process I Rule 60(b) Jurisdiction Whether the Due Process Clause pennits a lower court to refuse to consider a Rule 60(b) motion because a prior notice of appeal divests jurisdiction, when the motion alleges evidence suppression vital to a § 1983 claim and the appellate court declines remand.
-
Evidence Withholding I Due Process Whether the State may withhold essential witness-identifying information in a § 1983 action without individualized judicial balancing or access to counsel.
-
Delay and Fundamental Fairness Whether a decade-long delay in adjudicating a prisoner's § 1983 claim, during which the State withheld essential evidence, violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of fundamental fairness.
-
Meaningful Access to Courts Whether denying access to essential witnesses, while withholding their identities and contact information, constitutes denial of meaningful access to courts. Stacy Hall v. Myotte, Fode, Beason 1 December 9,2025
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Stacy Hall
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 20 2026Petition DENIED.
- Mar 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Dec 09 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2026)