David Leslie Culverhouse v. Texas

0 \ ft ( ( U.S, C0N-ST, /iM£A)D.£ , In all ceii^tA^/ pre recat^oA^ ( the acca^zd SJ s S'hali enjoy +he cd^ t? spetfy mJ public trialt by qn 2? o impartial Aury /of tke- t^A^re//) tAe cr>m& -4l ’ 5— z ^^11 have b^cn co mm i tte J t \Aihicb district h ail kqyc been * —I co O-s _ ’ $ qrcecta/he7 Ay CMet gj/iJ rwo/>gHy e-rrfcptv< arr^TM^oJ counsel z v2------ - ■* ITS O n w -— n 9 O -< > H rQ S S'hqj/ QdU^T Ce^u<r€ tV>« Stater to b^Y VfflU&/\A(£i'AQ^ Clcti/S't of fAe C+A fiME^b, CL < Col\lfT, U-^ev^i 3+oje ^(judges -pronn^uq ^onf^' T— * * 2> ever tke fM/y ei jMo/ir of MA f rorecuf^r q/i d o 0 3 « i> defmJ ants'; c/iQAjt7\y Ve^ue and U^cAoye to more ead ly QcjWly Mnacenj ftMy W|,M tAere 15 ev/Jgnce tn 'H>e record to ^up^ort change c[/enu€^icina^z/? vola,-^ pH-Xnefcr H.t.CwrWm, Can 7?XajKftovJincj ^‘tbAtfld/cflnceat deaf evUence of ^,'J ocKa( ,-nngcc^e Md ^fitied^r^ of l~lgb Court novZ reoi,' . . fro ns