Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-1420 · judgment June 10, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
When can or cannot a statute of limitations be raised in order to immediately dismiss and prevent a case from moving forward, even one having potentially enormous consequences for the entire country, not just a single individual and in particular one having consequences for taxpayers as well?
-
What are groups of defense attorneys allowed to do and not allowed to do in their efforts to win a case having many independent defendants and can that include coordination and/or collusion in a single defense strategy without the knowledge or informed consent of their independent clients in writing as to possible conflicts of interest resulting therefrom.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
George Sachs
For respondent
Gabriel E. Bedoya
Honigman LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 14 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 09 2026Waiver of right of respondent Julie Zona, Christine Fuentes, JZ Consulting LLC, Polaris Strategic Communications LLC to respond filed.
- Jan 09 2026Waiver of right of respondent Dr. Manhar Dhanak to respond filed.
- Jan 09 2026Waiver of right of respondents Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Sea Grant, Stefano Brizzolara, Yming Liu, Michael Triantafyllou, Dick K.P. Yue, The Stevens Institute of Technology, and Muhammad R. Hajj to respond filed.
- Jan 09 2026Waiver of right of respondents Curtis Libby, Anthony Viselli to respond filed.
- Jan 08 2026Waiver of right of respondent Pedro Lomonaco to respond filed.
- Jan 08 2026Waiver of right of respondent Honeywell International Inc. to respond filed.
- Dec 29 2025Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
- Dec 17 2025Waiver of right of respondents Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and Richardo, Inc. to respond filed.
- Sep 08 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2026)