Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
May Chen v. District of Columbia, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 25-7106 · judgment November 3, 2025
Questions presented
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 20, petitioner hereby further appeal the U.S. Court of Appeals judgment due to unresolved complaints (U.S. Court of Appeals Case No. 25-7106). All other Petition for a Writ of Certiorari were filed as following: Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on June 27, 2023 No. 23-5501 “May Chen v. MPD” Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on August 6, 2024 May Chen v. EEOC et.al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on March 18, 2025 May Chen v. District of Columbia et.al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on Nov 3, 2025 May Chen v. M & T Bank et.al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on Nov 12, 2025 May Chen v. District of Columbia et.al. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 13, all of the above referenced petition was filed within 90 days after the issuance of judgment. Petitioner strictly followed all court rules in a timely manner.
-
Supreme Court Rule 20 and Rules of Judicial Conduct Rule 1.1, “a judge(s) shall comply with the law, including the Code of Judicial Conduct”. For example, in regards to the subject case, judge Katsas; Walker; Childs and the U.S. Court of Appeal Clerk Clifton B. Cislak disobeys the law F, R.C.P. Rule 55 (default I default judgment) based on F. R. C. P. Rule 12 (failure to answer Summons & Complaints), F. R. App. P. Rule 31 (failure to file Reply Brief), F. R. App. P. Rule 27 (Emergency Motions) as well as all other applicable law refenced under Table of Authorities. Failure to correct the U.S. District Court errors upon petitioner’s timely filing “Request to Enter Default Judgment”. Pursuant to F.R. App. P. Rule 34(a)(2) and 34(j): failure to conduct hearing, deny Petition for Rehearing, wrongfully dispose of appeal.
-
Supreme Court Rule 10. Pursuant to the Rules of Judicial Conduct Rule 2.2, “a judge shall uphold and apply the law, and shall perform all duties ofjudicial office fairly and impartially”. For instance, the petitioner was treated extremely unfairly and discriminated against. The Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Carol W. Elswick et.al. made wrongful judgment for an untaken table cloth ($30) caused by sexual assault. On the contrary, U.S. Court of Appeals judges and clerks dismissed all of the crimes accused herein supported by the statement of the facts, applicable law, clear and convincing evidence, court docket sheet etc. Page 2 of 40
Counsel of record
For petitioner
May Chen
For respondent
Marcella Elizabeth Coburn
Office of the Attorney General for DC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- May 18 2026Rehearing DENIED.
- Apr 22 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/14/2026.
- Apr 14 2026Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Mar 30 2026Petition DENIED.
- Mar 12 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2026.
- Mar 05 2026Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
- Nov 13 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2026)