Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Shawn Baldwin v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 21-2925 · judgment August 13, 2025
Question presented
.... i Parties to the Proceeding..... ii Table of Contents..... iii , Table of Authorities..... iv Opinions Below..... 1 Jurisdiction..... 1 Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved..... 1 Statement of the Case..... 2 Reasons for Granting the Petition..... 6 LThe Seventh Circuit's Tolerance of a Conviction Based on Mathematically Impossible Expert Testimony Creates a Profound Due Process Error Warranting This Court's Review....... 7 IL The Decision Below Deepens a Circuit Split Regarding the Use of Temporally Impossible Facts in Calculating Sentencing Guidelines Intended Loss. ..... 10 III. This Court Should Grant Certiorari to Address Egregious Brady Violations and the Appellate Court's Reliance on a Clear Factual Error to Excuse Them....... 12 IV. The Erroneous Preclusion of Timely Sentencing Objections Violates Rule 32(f) and Fundamental Due Process 14 Conclusion..... 16 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)..... 12,13 Giglio v. United States,405 U.S. 150 (1972) .... 12, 13 In re Winship,397 U.S. 358 (1970)..... 7, 9 Kyles v. Whitley,514 U.S. 419 (1995)..... 13 Montoya v. Hernandez,473 U.S. 531 (1985)..... 14, 15 Napue v. Illinois,360 U.S. 264 (1959)..... 7, 9 United States v. Bagley,473 U.S. 667 (1985)..... 12 United States v. Eschweiler,782 F.2d 1385 (7th Cir. 1986)..... 14,15 United States v. Munoz,430 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 2005)..... 11 United States v. Saadeh,61 F.3d 510 (7th Cir. 1995)..... 9 Constitutional Provisions & Statutes U.S. Const, amend. V..... 1,7 U.S.Const. amend. VI..... 1,12 U.S.Const. amend. XIV... 1,7 18 U.S.C.§ 1343..... 2 28 U.S.C.§ 1254(1)..... 1 Rules & Guidelines Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f)..... 1,14,15 U.S.S.G.§ 2B1.1..... 10,11 OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (App. 1a-21a) is not yet widely reported. The district court's judgment and sentencing memoranda are unreported but are available in the joint appendix.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shawn Baldwin
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 08 2026Petition DENIED.
- May 20 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2026.
- May 08 2026Reply of petitioner Shawn Baldwin filed.
- May 01 2026Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
- May 01 2026Supplemental brief of petitioner Shawn Baldwin filed.
- Mar 27 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2026.
- Mar 25 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 1, 2026 to May 1, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Mar 02 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2026.
- Feb 27 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2026 to April 1, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
- Nov 06 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2026)