Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

James Daniel Arbaugh v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 23-7186, 24-6048 · judgment July 18, 2025


Certiorari denied · March 9, 2026

Question presented

Has America become so great that it need not consider due process, comity among nations, follow international law, or fulfill its treaty obligations? Why are the lower courts not upholding the Constitution?

  1. Did Congress exceed the outer limits of the Foreign Commerce Clause when amending 18 U.S.C. § 2423(c) to criminalize non­ commercial, illicit sexual conduct occurring entirely in a foreign sovereign territory among its residents?

  2. Can the President and two-thirds of the Senate, by the sole fact of their consent to a treaty, empower Congress to enact legislation that it otherwise could not enact by the exercise of its enumerated powers in Article I? Was a single passing statement in Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920) --@ "(i]f the treaty is valid**... "there can be no dispute about the validity of the statute" -- meant to expand Congress' authority?

  3. May the United States prosecute its citizen without the consent of the foreign sovereign where the crime was committed? Does the holding in The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116, 136 (1812) and its progeny -- that "[t]he jurisdiction of the nation within its own territory is necessarily exclusive and absolute," unless it expressly or impliedly consents to surrender it -- apply only in extradition proceedings where the foreign sovereign is requesting the defendant?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
James Daniel Arbaugh

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Mar 09 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 19 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2026.
  3. Feb 11 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Dec 05 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2026)