Joseph D. Reaves v. Pennsylvania

Does the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment entitle an Petitioner in a PCRA Petition, Notice of Appeal and Allowance of Appeal where the state court’s failed to address and correct improper denial of a claims for an evidentiary hearing, withdrawal guilty plea, new trial, invoke insanity defense, competency hearing and sanity commission, and subsequent resentencing based on Defendant true military psychiatric medical history based on newly discovered evidence of clear and convincing evidence in the nature of military law mandates and defendant psychiatric diagnosis of Military PTSD and Schizophrenia. The clear materiality of the newly discovered evidence goes to the : (1) Trial or verdict; (2) Withdrawal of Guilty Plea; (3)

Whether the State Government erred in fact or law deny PCRA petition due to 1988 diagnosis was available?

Whether Petitioner raised incompetency for the first time in 2023 before the PCRA Court ?

Whether the State Court are benefiting from Federal concealment, error, crimes and evidence deprivation?

Whether the State Court refual to review Petitioner Petitions liberally as a Pro se litigant.