Roman V. Serpik v. Jill Weedon, former Judge, Second Judicial District Court of Oklahoma, et al.

80S TIONS PRESENTED

1. Did the Tenth Circuit Court ofAppeals err by failing to address threshold State v. 'Roman Serpik LLC CROMAN SERPIK”),, Beckham County Okla. District before permitting Respondents to invoke “qualified immunity,” in contravention of this CdtoShf fetjttiiesieist th« reached (Steel Co. v. Cilfeens fee a Better Eav’t, S23 US. 83 (1388))? Access to Courts While Incarcerated* 2~ ffig-EttgLFifiKfifidWWtoMl Amendments—specifically, the right to speak, to access the courts, and to enjoy restricted to one hour per week of law-library access pursuant to ex parte judicial ordfiH- te; togttafifiy wtef&aa electronic law library was fully operational? and where these restrictions directly p$eyfe^<RftiMb»8tAbto (a) m&y b^mdtot Ms pleadtogb to S&pSk y. Weedon, Nos. 23-cv0988-JD and 23cv-1030JD (WJX Okla) following the district Eeteffity ix to 4»aa<. afiflCb) ptotiifit wttofi practice to Beckham County Case CV-23’40 and Custer County Case No. SC-23 dismissal <eitotos ^dptojudiftb—^to^asy to S^&, 43© US. 817 (ISM Mtn&as&M. 488 US. 471 (1©M. Judicial Bias and l^charactorization*

2. Did tM Mw emaeto mwssSMb by Petitioner as a “sovereign citizen9’ in order to dismiss jurisdictional and Petitioner’s right to define his own legal identity and to be heard on legitimate .to with y. A2! 5SS ILS. 868 (2009), and Wsferv. 436 U.S. 478 (1878)?