Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Roger Hoan Brady v. Sircoya M. Williams, Warden, et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 25-2552 · judgment December 8, 2025

Certiorari denied · March 23, 2026

Questions presented

In light of the missing voir dire transcript, did the U.S. n District Court erred when it held that Petitioner’s Batson claim was procedurally defaulted because this claim was not presented on direct appeal before post conviction?
In light of the missing voir dire transcript, did <fihe U.S. District Court erred when it held that Petitioner's Batson claim was procedurally defaulted because this claim was not presented on collateral attack during and after post conviction?
Given the fact that 52% of the transcripts are missing due to negligence by the court reporter, did the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit erred by denying the Certificate of Appealability?
Did the U.S. District Court erred by failing to read and consider Petitioner's claim of innocence?

For petitioner
Roger H. Brady

For respondent
—

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Mar 23 2026
Petition DENIED.
Mar 05 2026
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
Dec 31 2025
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2026)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Proof of Service