Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Clarence Albert Gipbsin v. United States, et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 25-5041 · judgment September 25, 2025


Certiorari denied · March 23, 2026

Question presented

I; Do tg -To -rtf-Q- fA^FcAA tty M'NXotfC //Xj F&#~ 3iS~ /fj VioL^7/Qj^ ] ,2rf/If-rl ^TA/ U, 5 cy^^-Tu^ izAAb //a/’^dAT4aJ Pc/blt-c, Dcz#- ^£L <’£?$ $ HU^rt t/ty 0F A F&&— T-> P-$~T be^^e-g -TfretsLer /Jo $>ub/&y <p&^?h^ &#- H-czM * AlLbc^e-^ yi c^rtM p(Cet/ £>y Czz<, ZV^et^ /’olzes^ DefAfi-'7!^^ y. ~7£f& ^iy^uc.erx AT'T'&FLAF, /(M^eXAT/i/^ &f> v^e /V^lzc- l/^^<^fi~zz<rr Tv llietydty fl^-r/Uu^ a ^ully PAlZ^y //^ (QJ^ fl^aT £>f ^Ot$ajA OllA <&f^ Ia^> / 1?/ C^jArtfiAfi-y -co -file Ca^3-r/'Tc^ <srf- yrrA (^"74/ g’V/J AlLovo^ S'ZAT^ 'F'&z^e&AL GOV'TS “To AQct#, & lr~Z'S. tfu-^liClAl. 0-^U^Ak, CM^65 <0/ F'^T \Au^l^y&~/ trf-c&Acy -ryf'&'/w t$, /oo c>f=- A^y cfii c^il t Di^A~rch £>y^_ fc?h ce 9-CrCo^ei^ / M/frclt CA( P~6^oSL<y^ Of- Ajoy P&A-&1., af T^6 c^yiM,&- op -7//6' lAO-TmAiLy -ZAf3a^e^r -co && )/o C&MGJ^T P-frCcrfiiS^ /^LCFj/yfy^^ ? ^/; WUL UA) l-T&g^ yT^ze^ C&U^C ^Fr&^-TALA Deez5Za2Aj !A-7^-T^ (faiyn$ ~-r^ ~z&teg, ytnctFQ^ 9 P&Cz^g^ aA CaJ-iSTt 'Zu^^r^A L y^JZiP AAa t&sip Dg-ei$/<iN £>/□ -7.^ N'SC^^t/V^i? ^>f- C&~ P ^JX ^"Z^-zrg;- (Foit'fis'tyy A^zF /^ypbFiA.'-T'G <L£>u^T^ F>

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Clarence Albert Gipbsin

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Mar 23 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 05 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
  3. Feb 26 2026
    Supplemental brief of petitioner Clarence Albert Gipbsin filed.
  4. Dec 02 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2026)