Michael L. Levinson v. Social Security Administration

A. Whether the clandestine replacement of Jewish Michael Levinson’s initial Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Hearing Officer with a Muslim ALF was prejudicial, violating his constitutional right to a fair and impartial hearing and his right to Due Process of Law? B. Whether the initial ALJ hearing decision ordering Michael Levinson’s two-year suspension and reduction in status lacks substantial evidence to support its decision and is therefore null and void? C. Whether the delay of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) in rendering Petitioner’s termination decision until the Republican Member left office, resulting in only the two MSPB Democrat Members to render Petitioner’s Decision of Termination violated Petitioner’s right to Due Process of Law? D. Whether the MSPB’s decision removing Petitioner, Michael Levinson, from office lacks substantial evidence to validate or support his removal and is therefore null and void? E . Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“USCAFC”) affirming the MSPB’s decision of removal lacks substantial evidence and is therefore null and void? F. Whether Social Security Administration’s use of the vague, all encompassing “Comply with Office Policy” attempting to legitimize its illegal conduct and decisions violates Michael Levinson’s right to Due Process of Law?