Leihinahina Sullivan v. United States

Qtesfions Presented setf6") WVieU'i-ev' Stoindky Counsel Rickard tloke violated SuUiv^mos. representation i/vhen he filed c*. Motice <d Jlntenf that lc pahenf ~ psychcoVtiewTipy records fvom Or Pieh which u/as cxll Shsirod ia/ iH~> plaintiff United States Attorney? (j.) WheHier if is structural error When Tud^ie Seaknaht ordered Sullivans psycho therapist/patient medical records wer Suthvans ejections when Judae Seabriqht released all of- those records fo Assisfeahf United Ste^f A+kn/irH^/ / piztuiz.+ttt'S tX .<dvid<d1i2 vex I ervCV' and arounds for reversal undeir Jdfteev. Redmond, SI8 (A.3. i. ( FKtcO? frectfihci psychiatrist without any vvaiveir or CjaAee v. Redmond > 518 U.S. ± Cco^ aaarnst her ultimately leading fo fke ConsMUwal R^lds C6tvuduK%l eriayl 1*^ isconduct- vvhen he changed C4) Whether Judge Sa^bhght er^aao Sullivans plea bargain fovnth A? entitled Sullivan 4o Withdraw <S) Whether 3udge SaalaW-^nt had j h.^ Sullen? M XthTXX VtofaW Sulliva^ s<k4h A^n^Cov^^l gjqVits to £ett-~repves&ntatic>n When if was revoked id fine heanr^ February 4-, 2022? rq.) h/hefher fhee is pn?secuh>h^l misconduct u/hen t Mtomew C^USA") Aetecczx Ann (feHmuMer and Marte-Moicfhevscn toy-falsely rep^hng 1W over IOO tnal cou r+&«l Judae Saalonciht were arand jun/ subpoenas v^ho/A fed.R.ciSn.P. Rule H, ZSU S-C-.^^i RfU1 A^end^1 Due P»vces& R-^hte.? Speedy Trial AeT and 18 U.S .c 328g. tX±X - l<0 WheVVev disWc*- erred vi Ueepin^ counjel on l«J«' representation nfler- loc>tVi Counsel barhee and SulVivzxn -filed nume»'tn4s Mo+ioiae> fp withdraw counsel as there was m conflicVc4- interest'' As Sullimn sued counsel in c.w>l case no. CV- 12-OC4^4— <TMS-&T <612 in-104-. EOF Klos. I4d^» IGIS, IS 13-, \Sl^ ? 1523)?