Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Rayon Payne
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether a United States District Court may transfer a case under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to a judicial district where the Plaintiff has already demonstrated and documented structural bias and ongoing constitutional violations, thereby denying meaningful access to judicial remedies.
-
Whether it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment for a District Court to allow the government to review the Plaintiff’s immigration file—used as the basis for its dispositive motion—while denying the Plaintiff access to the same records, and subsequently ruling on the government’s motion.
-
Whether a District Court may sidestep its statutory responsibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) by transferring the case after acknowledging jurisdiction and after the Plaintiff invoked that provision to compel action on a naturalization application.
-
Whether a litigant is entitled to relief where the District Court closes the case while simultaneously placing the Plaintiff in procedural limbo by transferring the matter into a structurally compromised judicial district and circuit, thereby leaving no viable judicial forum for redress.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Rayon Payne
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 26 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 07 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
- Dec 29 2025Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to respond filed.
- Aug 21 2025Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 5, 2026)