Ayyakkannu Manivannan v. Department of Energy, et al.

Did 3rd Circuit Court err by blatantly accepting District Court’s erroneous interpretation on a County Prothonotary-signed court order, not signed by a Judge, violating 5 U.S.C. §552a(b)(H) and causing a Circuit split?

Did 3rd Circuit and District Courts err in their opinion and judgement that it is “inapposite” to D.C. Circuit’s previous ruling on issues of material fact remaining with respect to Privacy Act violation claims in Bartel case, causing a Circuit split?

Did 3rd Circuit/District Courts err by implicitly accepting “COMITY’ as a mechanism permitting agency DOE to release Privacy documents for a criminal case circumventing the exceptions under 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) (3), (7), (11), ignoring Kalkines warnings causing a Circuit split?

Did the 3rd Circuit/District Courts err on Privacy Act routine use under subsection 5 U.S.C. §552(e)(3)(C) for Manivannan case from previous rulings by 9th (Covert), 3rd (Britt) and D.C. (USPS) Circuits, causing a divided opinion?

Did the 3rd Circuit/District Courts err in not considering that the agency DOE conduct is willful in providing privacy documents for a criminal proceeding, violating Privacy Act exceptions, routine use and Kalkines!