Kenneth Christopher Pointer, aka Keith Johnson v. United States

QUESTON NUMBER ONE: Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to conduct a prompt Evidentiary Hearing and the Sixth Circuit's affirmance of that decision based upon Pointer's ineffectiveness claim as it relates to failing to conduct adequate legal research; failure to thoroughly review Indictment; and failure to file a pre-trial Motion to Dismiss Fatally Defective Superseding Indictment, thus, did this violate his Sixth Amendment Rights of the U.S. Constitution. QUESTION NUMBER TWO: Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to conduct a prompt Evidentiary Hearing and the Sixth Circuit's affirmance of that decision based upon Pointer's ineffectiveness claim as it relates by his ex-trial counsel failing to object to a determination regarding unanimous jury verdict, thus, did this violate his Sixth Amendment Rights of the U.S. Constitution ? QUESTION NUMBER THREE: Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to conduct a prompt Evidentiary Hearing and the Sixth Circuit's affirmance of that decision based upon Pointer's trial stage error ineffectiveness claim, thus, did this violate his Sixth Amendment Rights of the U.S. Constitution ?