Torrence Belcher v. Terri Hale, et al.

Questions pg.1

1. Should the intervening circumstances be consider when questioning the Continuing Validity or soundness of this case??

2. What is good reasons to change a rule or policy that helps gives prisoners incentive to stay conduct free??

3. Why doesn’t the constitution require state actors to enforce their own policies and regulations?

4. And how isn’t that consider discrimination if they do for some and not ALL??

5. Can privately owned prisons choose to feed us sometimes and not all the time?

6. Why aren’t prisoners entitled to showers or hygiene products?

7. Doesn’t the 14 amendment forbid states from creating laws that abridge privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States?

8. Which one of the 50 states doesn’t have to follow the constitution??

9. Does all the states have to follow the federal law??

10. If a state would to create a law and for that law to be approved it has to fall in line with the 14th amendment, or that would be consider a 14th amendment violation, if it didn’t right??

11. What does equal protection of the law mean?

12. What does abridging privileges mean?

13. If an employee of the State of Indiana makes a statement that there isn’t enough jobs for everyone then hires a new employee would that make them bias or prejudices???

14. How can a state law violation, not be a constitutional violation??

15. Can a law be created, state or federal that doesn’t adhere to the constitution??

16. How isn’t a state law violation, not a constitutional violation??

17. What is the definition of discrimination? And does that definition change depending on where you are located at in the United States??

18. How can a person be discriminated against according to state law and not federal law??