Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Charlie Bullock v. Virginia
IFP petition · Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 250170 · judgment September 3, 2025
Question presented
-
. In claim number two of petitioner's state "Motion to Vacate", was the petitioner's 14th Amendment Due Process Rights violated when Detective Cuffley gave false testimony at trial regarding alleged bullet holes in Brittney Carmon's SUV?
-
. In claim number five of petitioner's state "Motion to Vacate", was the petitioner's 14th Amendment Due Process Rights to Fundamental Fairness violated when Brittney Carmon, petitioner's girlfriend, was used as a witness at trial and testified that petitioner fired the first shot when actually Brittney's brother, the victim admitted to police that he blacked out and fired the first shot and kept shooting until his clip was empty?
-
. In claim number seven of petitioner's state "Motion to Vacate", was petitioner's 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment Due Process Rights violated when the Commonwealth refused to call the victim to testify at trial, although victim was present in court, thus, preventing petitioner from facing his accuser?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Charlie Bell Bullock
For respondent
Kevin Michael Gallagher
Virginia Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 15 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 14 2026Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
- Dec 02 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2026)