Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Francisco Junior Louis v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 23-10643 · judgment August 11, 2025
Question presented
Is a criminal defendant’s statutory and constitutional right to a speedy trial violated when the delay in obtaining an indictment arose from the government’s failure to present the case to the grand jury for Covid-19 reasons not attributable to the defendant, the delay is timely challenged by the defendant’s pro se motion filed soon after expressing disagreement with court-appointed counsel, and the subsequent delay in commencing trial ran afoul of his constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING All parties are listed in the caption.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Benedict P. Kuehne
Kuehne Davis Law, P.A.
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 15 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 12 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Dec 15 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2026)