William J. O'Brien, III v. United States

'■ |saWritof Audita Querela under28 USC 1651, the "All Writs Act", applicable where a defendant was ^:ZedpdertetbeSupremeCourfsUNITEOSTATESv.— and defendant new cannot hie a Second of Successive 26 USC 2255, and because of the Supreme Courts easton JONES v. HENDRIX 143 S. Ct 1357.216 L Ed. 2d 475 (June 22.2023) where defendant is barred from reiief rom “ ""The Z«HAN decision established that the statute of conviction did not cover the Physician's conduct. ■ able at habeas Without a Second or Successive 23 USC 2255, nor a 28 USC 2241, That claim is cognizable at habeas, vviuiuut the "All Writs Act" under 28 USC 1651 does provide the needed relief with Audita Querela. :USci65iprov^