Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Marcus T. Dixon v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 23-2427 · judgment May 7, 2025
Certiorari denied · February 23, 2026
Question presented
- Law enforcement conducted warrantless searches related to Marcus Dixon and a supervision condition that allowed searches of “his” property. He moved to suppress property seized in those searches in part based on an invalid invocation of the search condition: law enforcement didn’t establish that the property was “his.” Should such a supervisee have at least limited standing to challenge warrantless searches based on supervision conditions authorizing searches of their property?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Adam Clay Stevenson
University of Wisconsin Law School
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 15 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 12 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Nov 24 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 21, 2026)
- Aug 19 2025Application (25A195) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until November 23, 2025.
- Aug 13 2025Application (25A195) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 24, 2025 to November 23, 2025, submitted to Justice Barrett.