Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joshua Abrams v. Richard Isolda
IFP petition · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-0561-23 · judgment May 1, 2025
Certiorari denied · February 23, 2026
Questions presented
-
Whether immunity doctrines eliminate all remedies for constitutional violations.
-
Whether judicial sanctions imposed as penalties require due process and a jury under the Seventh and Fourteenth Amendments. I
-
Whether mandatory third-party access costs unconstitutionally restrict access to justice.
-
Whether the Constitution requires a functional forum for the redress of grievances.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joshua M. Abrams
For respondent
Mark J. Molz
Mark J. Molz
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 22 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
- Jan 15 2026Waiver of right of respondent Richard Isolda to respond filed.
- Dec 10 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2026)