Gary Allen Kachina v. United States

n one Lj_O.CS A >4jff£llt£l£_Cou.rT Errs_r_ar Cowt i~H- Z 5-trurfu.rg/[mr when Wakincj A D i5kone$+Opinion Concluding Tkcr+ The APPeilanTS oF Judicial Bia$ i$ inodeQi^TeK/ 5utpporred D'hen The Record Snauii Thej>is7r?<Tz/l4rT~ ^lunyes <ac~b on s Mid cenjucT ove rwineiMi/ioiy DispioyThe MoCf EXTrene coje oFciudiCial Bi^-S (/To "He pJrYT ij.F ?emc| CriM-.nn| ^cti on $ ByThe, OiSTticT(oj^t jiAck? ’■ TWO Doti J\ AppeHa-fc CourT p&oe\ bispmy Judicial ft'ias ^ao-m'ingy i))3WsToy>nic>n itarino-tkrc< pre.?onderc</<dFTk Evidence 5uppar7&/jTke DBTHcr Courts eicterti-ntrticzxlhtrj 4ppe I kifT violated Qjjec/’n I c^ndiTon oFHiS Superv I Si OA,v/hen "Mo Evidence"i>uos pF SSedTcd-OC If ledjTo 6upparT~ k? JjiSTri cT (ou r~E$ " TudgeM<?n7"-rha-1 ^ppeiian—'LeFT pork Avenue TcpsCTMenT ■ V)nV\ixn. Ajyrbvd A(nd v/us ^rJcL&rqed>'^J%eonii/ Evident? P>r?f(?n7ed mThe Case wasC/proven perjured "7^-iilAOAy ByU.5.prabfti',on oFFitpr Lqufr Kuer s—A a Three f djces A nPp^HcTecourT Error in cc opinion When Tydyiq’HtfA The Manner in WhicV\7V^ T^eVoczdioA f Fleariyn W^S (onclucTed do AJc-r JupporT Reversal y/tanThe. Recard^Vitjwls P^Vrtk^erHad LHerii/ NO RiqHs11 Darina Tke 'Reydcct'On Neariog AN wa.s<J)M5 c(TmuI1' V€ Error