Jae S. Nah v. Andrew V. Jablon, et al.

In this early stage of litigation, DC and Appeal courts ignored 1-188 pages of factual evidence showing 7 Orders of 4 federal courts ruled by frauds on the courts by the attorneys of the courts, and abruptly dismissed the complaint without inquiry into the vast range of factual evidence. To this date, the Courts and Defendants did not rebut the factual evidence of 4 federal and 1 state courts for frauds on courts stated in the complaint. Question: Can DC and Appeal courts dismiss the complaint of the case 2:23-cv-06909 without further inquiry into the factual evidence of 5 courts and allegation for fraud on courts?

The factual evidence in the complaint show Attorney Jablon in CV15-2075/2343/2347/2351 filed “Motion to remand and 3 Motions to stay” with misrepresented statements “BC571555 in the state court had no federal copyright questions” against material fact of 1-735 copyright discovery Jablon executed in state court BC571555 prior to “Motion to remand & 3 Motions to stay” filed. After BC571555 remanded and sustained in state court by “Order of remand and 3 Orders of stay” ruled by frauds, Jablon filed state court BC571555 with “Motion to compel 735 copyright discovery”. The discovery was executed in the state court of