Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brett Talmadge v. Alaska
IFP petition · Supreme Court of Alaska, No. S-18765 · judgment March 19, 2025
Question presented
QUESETION(S) PRESENTED I. DID THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT MISAPPLY HECK V. HUMPHREY. II. DOES THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT'S ERROR UNDERMINE THE BILL OF ATTAINDER PROHIBITION III. IS THIS ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE IV. DOES THIS DECISION BY THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT AVOID FEDERAL QUESTIONS? LIST OF PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. TABLE OF CONTENTS OPINIONS BELOW JURISDICTION .................................... CONSTITUTINAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT CONCLUSION APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E RSLAT&D CASSS J, 3PA-6<7-oofis'C.£ 2. ?>PA -/?- otweA
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brett Talmadge
For respondent
Georgia R. Smithee
Alaska Department of Law
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 26 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jan 08 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
- Dec 17 2025Waiver of right of respondent Alaska to respond filed.
- Jun 15 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 24, 2025)