Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Melanie Nicole Moore v. Pooches of Largo, Inc., et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 23-13568 · judgment May 20, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether the district court’s characterization of Petitioner’s unpaid wage complaint as “merely” a contract dispute rather than a violation of the FLSAdespite wages falling below the statutory minimum, improperly narrowed the statutory remedial scheme and stripped the Petitioner of the Act’s retaliation protection, in conflict with the standard established in Kasten v. St.-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 563 U.S. 1 (2011).
-
Whether the Eleventh Circuit erroneously affirmed the trial court’s failure to recognize a baseless lawsuit as actionable retaliation, thereby dismissing the entire action premised on the flawed calculation of the limitations period from the date of termination, nullifying the jury’s verdict in favor of Petitioner on the wage claim, and barring all recovery over a 16-day variance, in conflict with the willfulness standard established in McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co., 486 U.S. 128 (1988)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Melanie Nicole Moore
For respondent
Matthew Seth Sarelson
Dhillon Law Group
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 12 2026Petition DENIED.
- Dec 24 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
- Dec 19 2025Waiver of right of respondent Pooches of Largo, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
- Aug 18 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2025)