Errol Victor, Sr. v. Louisiana, et al.

QUESTION(s) FOR REVIEW 1. WHETHER THE STATE APPELLATE COURT COMMITTED PLAIN JURIS­ DICTIONAL ERROR WHEN GRANTING STATE APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR EXTENTION AFTER FILING DEADLINES HAD PASSED FOR CONSIDER­ ATIONS ? 2. ’ WHETHER THIS CASE INVOLVES THE DEPREVIATION OF APPELLANT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO SELF REPRESENTATION AND RISHT• TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ON DIRECT APPEAL REVIEWS UNDER THE U.S. CONST. XIV. VI. AMENDMENTS ? 3. WHETHER STATE OF LOUISIANA APPELLATE COURT CIRCUMVENTED THE LEGAL PROCESS FOR ALLOWING THE AGGRIEVED APPELLANT ON REMAND," ONE FULL ROUND " OF STATE COURT'S DIRECT APPEAL REVIEW AND CHALLENGE TO IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONALLY BARRED/PROHIBITED RE-TRIAL ?