Terrance Deshun Cash v. United States

Petitioner Cash contend that his constitutional rights was violated be­ fore the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals due to the stated facts raised beforethe court in his writ of certiorari stipulating applicable caselaws, and in support of Cash arguments, in the court ruling in Crawford V. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Petitioner Cash contends that the appellate court for the Fifth Circuit failed to render a decision on the two constitutional claims raised be-: fore the court. Petitioner Cash willfully argued that his Due Process un­ der the Fifth Amendment was violated during his jury trial proceedings, and his Sixth Amendment rights under the Sixth Amendment was violated under the confrontation clause. The evidence is-clear that officer Ductan's testify about statements made by Lauren Danielle Davis, in regard to her association with petitioner Cash, office Ductan consistently made assertions toward petitioner Cash during jury trial proceedings, which re­ sult in a direct violation of Cash constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment, and the hearsay rule by allowing officer Ductan to testify about statements Ms Davis made during her interviwe with other police officers, such statements was totally inconsistence with Ductan testimony before the district court. Petitioner Cash argues that Respondent/Government used Ms. Davis out of court statements to assert before the court testimony that was flawed and misinterpreted and demonstrated prejudice before the jurors.