Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Shanna M. Glynn v. Marquette City Police Department, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-1486 · judgment March 24, 2025
Question presented
Page: 2 I. QUESTIONS i. Can stare decisis deny a victim of violent crime, their right to due process and full and fair review? ii. Does Hans v. Louisiana remove the requirement that states serve their citizens, be held accountable by them, and uphold the U.S. Constitution? iii. Does current common law require that I name innocent parties as defendants in order to be heard? II. LIST OF PARTIES All parties appear in caption. III. RELATED CASES Any case where a victim has been granted no due process, has endlessly asked for help from all reasonable authorities, and has been ignored, abused and dismissed; specifically, victims of violent crime who have been denied full and fair review because of: Hans v. Louisiana or misuses of stare decisis.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shanna M. Glynn
For respondent
Karen E. Beach
Nauts, Dwaihy, Beach & Moran, PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Mar 23 2026Petition DENIED.
- Feb 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
- Feb 25 2026Waiver of right of respondent Marquette City Police Department to respond filed.
- Feb 09 2026Petitioner complied with order of January 20, 2026.
- Jan 20 2026The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 10, 2026, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
- Dec 31 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
- Dec 11 2025Waiver of right of respondent State of Michigan to respond filed.
- Aug 29 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2025)