Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Larry E. Clark
IFP petition
Dismissed · December 15, 2025
Questions presented
- IS NON-PARTY, AND NON-CITED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (“USA”) AND DIST. CT. JUDGE, DONALD E. WALTER, ONE AND SAME INDIVIUAL PERSON, AND/OR, ONE AND SAME FEDERAL OFFICER, AND, IF NOT, WAS PETITIONER’S SUIT FILED IN CADDO PARISH STATE COURT EVER REMOVED TO FEDERAL COURT, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE RECORD SHOWS THAT ONLY NON-PARTY THE USA APPEARED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL? 2. IS IT A CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY OF THIS U. S. SUPREME COURT TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE U. S. 5th CIRCUIT ORDERING IT TO PERFORM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY: REVERSE THE JULY 25, 2024 JUDGMENT DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE ALL CLAIMS OF ALL PLAINTIFFS’ IN THEIR STATE COURT FILED SUIT ILLEGALLY REMOVED TO THE W. D. CT. OF LA, SHREVEPORT - DIVISION & FOR ALL ORDERS/JUDGMENTS ISSUED BY ANY DISTRICT COURT BE DECLARED VOID SINCE A “USURPATION OF POWER” WAS COMMITTED BECAUSE ONLY FEDERAL JURISDICTION WAS THAT OF THIS U. S. SUPREME COURT? 3. IS THE U.S. 5™ CIRCUIT NEGLECTING ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION BY REFUSING TO FOLLOW ITS OWN PRECEDENT ISSUED IN: ZIEGLER V. CHAMPION MORTG. CO., ET AL., 913 F.2d 228 (1990), WHERE ITS OWN MOTION THE APPELLATE COURT REVERSED THE DISTRICT COURT AND REMANDED THE CASE?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Larry E. Clark
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 15 2025The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Nov 26 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
- Nov 13 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Nov 13 2025Supplemental brief of petitioner Clark, In Re Larry E. filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 17 2025Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2025)