In Re Alex Smith

Questions of Law •*

1. Was it a violation of a postconviction petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause 'of 'the 14th Amendment* to the U.S. Constitution, for the district court not to grant default judgment at hearing on 07-14-2025, given he was without counsel? >

2. Did Montana supreme court violate petitioner's rights under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Const, by denying Writ of Supervisory Control to take control over dist. court which ignored motions on purpose, that were sent by the petitioner, from after 09-07-2023 until ordered to respond by the supreme court and.then .for the supreme court to ignore newly discovered Miranda violations petitioner brought up in motions to convert postconviction to habeas corpus (and both courts suppressing information concerning petitioner's innocence)? List of Parties

3. ' Mont. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, Cascade Co. 415 2nd Ave. N. Great Falls,MT 59401

4. Montana supreme court P.O. Box 203003 Helena, MT 59620

5. Boland Aarab Law (former defense counsel) 11 5th St. N. Ste.207 Great Falls, MT 59401 Related Cases• . DDV 21-589 on appeal, in postconviction ' ' OP 22-0694 MT supreme court (MTSC) habeas denied for lack of merit. OP 23-0241 MTSC supervisory control denied on false claims, by court. OP223-O281 MTSC disregarded evidence, declined supervisory control. OP 24-0281 MTSC denied habeas relief, falsely claiming no medical documents were provided the court. OP 23-0282 MTSC denied sup. control, despite evidence that dist. court ignored motions for about 8 months and suppressed testimony. OP 24-0008 MTSC denied habeas relief again claming no medical docsawere provided to court. Tablesof Contents OPINIONS BELOW JURISDICTION JURISDICTION CONST."L?STATUTORY PROVISIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE REASONS FOR GRANTING WRIT CONCLUSION APPENDIX A Judgments against which relief is sought APPENDIX B Exhibits/Documentary Evidence APPENDIX C Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 3 - 2