Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Drew Craig, et al. v. John Krueger, Individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 24-7035, 24-7037, 24-7066 · judgment August 22, 2025


Certiorari denied · March 23, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

This case involves an attempt by several law enforcement officers to detain and arrest Respondents’ decedent Jeffery Krueger on July 1, 2019. On that night, in the middle of a busy highway, Mr. Krueger resisted the arresting deputies’ commands. Other officers – including Petitioners Blair, Craig, McFarland and Nevitt – were summoned to the scene to assist after the arrest had already begun. They were unaware of the basis or background for the arrest but reasonably believed Mr. Krueger was resisting arrest and assaulting police officers. Mr. Krueger was ultimately restrained, placed in a prone position in handcuffs and yet continued to struggle. The officers and deputies eventually placed leg chains and a hobble chain on Mr. Krueger and then removed all controlling force. However, soon thereafter, Mr. Krueger began shallow breathing. He was taken to a hospital, but he ultimately passed away. The medical examiner found that the probable cause of death was “cardiac dysrhythmias due to probable acute psychosis in the setting of physical exertion and restraint.” The District Court rejected Petitioners’ qualified immunity defense with regard to Respondents’ Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals conducted a de novo review, rejected portions of the findings of the District Court, but affirmed the denial of qualified immunity. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in denying qualified immunity to Petitioners on the issue of excessive force w ithout conducting an

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Matthew Benjamin Free
Best & Sharp

For respondent
Christopher Eberhart Kemmitt
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Related
Vide, 25-594

Proceedings

  1. Mar 23 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 25 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
  3. Feb 09 2026
    Brief of respondents John Krueger, et al. in opposition filed.
  4. Dec 15 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 9, 2026.
  5. Dec 12 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2026 to February 9, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Dec 09 2025
    Response Requested. (Due January 8, 2026)
  7. Dec 03 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
  8. Dec 01 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent John Krueger, et al. to respond filed.
  9. Nov 20 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 24, 2025)