Terry Lee Miksell v. United States

It is asked of this High Court as to whether the District Court had jurisdiction under Gozales v Raich, 545 US 1 (2005) to prosecute this case, which occurred entirely within the borders of one state, just because the cell phone was manufactured elsewhere?

Was _the finding of the evidence being sufficient to support the Petitioner's conviction when trial counsel neither moved to suppress nor to expand the record to include all electronic messages sent and received by the Petitioner and victim?

Was the finding of the evidence was sufficient and fair when counsel failed to depose witnesses or victim, inhibiting a full and fair defense and Due Process under the Sixth Amendment of the United States? „

Does the Eighth Circuit precedent bar ineffective assistance of counsel claims against trial attorney in the direct appeal violate the Supreme Court decision under Garza, Jr. v Idaho,