Lynell Guyton v. United States

Y Did CdOOiR,^ wAW for Ybt of Abt OaroiUA ^b&W Act to b<^ to aml^ueS. 2\ Dot'b the DruQ Ev\Wcw<\«\t A^c^s failw to scheAuto (X?\ anaAo^qe m\aw nvtvo Co<^VAuYtfM»A Ctf>t\ce • Y-Z<b if exaeJ CoasAHqtvfcOcvU^ le<j<U fa" the jowotcA -to pme c< persons r\exvo c^A. \ef ^novMcchjt of on uftfc^u\oAei subsAranc’C5 AiA^reA U<yd sAto-Vcas Q5 cZcontrohci' ^ubsWce YWk (XCA’iDfVS ? HV Can (X pasoa be pvosccaW ^oc (ka\^ a(X befet Abo D<^ ^evAorcc^wV Z\ t'icdVo -tb^ u^ceboe^ CofxAc o*d Aoc (X *5^6^ o wvx\o^q,<; ? 5Y MW Vbc u\VW( of ^Vcqdr'vo^ art trconw5 p\a| tbe ywxtWKk dt^{ <\ (kWcW^" ^gA bt Wa^ p^Zd'«J bj tbe cxni VorfuA W ab^Udc due prated ri^hb^. C\X5thtto wguabH <» etomuvt in 21 U.^ C +haf tbe 5qb^f a nee cct is^ue be CoairolU I«4