Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Matthew Johnson v. Oklahoma
IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, No. PC-2025-607 · judgment August 27, 2025
Questions presented
-
Whether the Oklahoma courts’ categorical refusal to grant evidentiary hearings on colorable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, actual innocence, and disproportionate sentencing conflicts with this Court’s precedents and violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Specifically, whether a state court may summarily deny factual development and evidentiary hearings when a petitioner presents detailed affidavits and credible evidence supporting constitutional claims, in direct tension with decisions such as Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487 (1962), Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (1963), and Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63 (1977).
-
Whether the Eighth Amendment prohibits the
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Matthew Johnson
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 12 2026Petition DENIED.
- Dec 04 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
- Sep 28 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 24, 2025)