Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Matthew Johnson v. Oklahoma

IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, No. PC-2025-607 · judgment August 27, 2025


Certiorari denied · January 12, 2026

Questions presented

  1. Whether the Oklahoma courts’ categorical refusal to grant evidentiary hearings on colorable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, actual innocence, and disproportionate sentencing conflicts with this Court’s precedents and violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Specifically, whether a state court may summarily deny factual development and evidentiary hearings when a petitioner presents detailed affidavits and credible evidence supporting constitutional claims, in direct tension with decisions such as Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487 (1962), Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (1963), and Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63 (1977).

  2. Whether the Eighth Amendment prohibits the

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Matthew Johnson

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 12 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 04 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
  3. Sep 28 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 24, 2025)