Ky Tan Le v. Stephen H. Locher, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

While presided the case in the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Respondent in a particular Order knowingly, willfully made, created false writing statement, committed federal crime in order to fault the Plaintiff as Petitioner. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3), is making, creating false writing statement to fault a party of a case, any case, as such as Respondent did to Petitioner, not a federal crime?

Accordingly and undeniably, Respondent is guilty of a federal crime against Petitioner. However, instead of entitling Petitioner to seek relief in the Court, the Chiefjudge in the proceedings of the case deprived of the Petitioner’s such right and the right to having the “equal protection ofthe laws’' violating the Fourteenth Amendment? App. 60a. While on the other hand, the Chief Judge inserted various unjust reasons to dismiss case, knowingly not bring the crime Respondent committed into consideration. WHY?

What was the reason, and why was the Chief Judge of the related U. S. District Court who presided the case complicit with the identified federal criminal as Respondent; silenced Respondent, not removed, not terminated Respondent as the identified federal criminal from the jury of the case, from Office while Petitioner had so requested {see App. 49a, first paragraph) but still retained the criminal as a judge against Petitioner, placed Petitioner under the authority of that criminal and forced Petitioner to withstand the affects and the unbearable mentality pressures to date?

Petitioner in the Notice of Appeal had made known to the Eighth Circuit Court that: