Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Greenpoint Mortgage Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AR2

IFP petition · Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, No. H049806


Dismissed · January 12, 2026

Questions presented

  1. Did the lower court violate Article VI Clause 2 as to the Supremacy Clause of Federal Constitution in relation to Land Patents and treaty laws on Land Patents?

  2. Did the lower court conceal embezzlement of about $1,200,000 of Petitioner’s and estate monies 14 days after the close of escrow in a chapter 13 bankruptcy case?

  3. Was labeling Petitioner a “vexatious litigant” by a state actor lawful?

  4. Did the lower court’s failure to consolidate case numbers 17cv314286*the unlawful detainer action with 17cv310716_ wrongful foreclosure action violate Petitioner's due process rights? -<5. Did Petitioner's invoking Chapter VI, section 18, subdivision (a) of the California Constitution remove the jurisdiction of the actor who issued the vexatious litigant order?

  5. Did the courts below violate California Government Code section 68081?

  6. Could a court administrator (“judge”) refuse to consolidate case numbers 17cv314286 and 17cv310716 when the alleged Defendant U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GREENPOINT MORTGAGE TRUST MORTGAGE PASS­ THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AR2 in Case Number 17cv310716 responded to the Petitioner’s claim, by court administrator’s relying on the “vexatious litigant order” ?

  7. Did the lower courts and their administrators (“judges”) violate the law by failing to report the crimes committed by Severson & Werson APC., its attorneys and all officers and directors all other companies involved such as inter alia, Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Clear Recon Corp., etc. to law enforcement for subsequent actions? -2-

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Fareed Sepehry-Fard

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
24A1138

Proceedings

  1. Jan 12 2026
    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
  2. Dec 04 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
  3. Aug 15 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2025)
  4. May 22 2025
    Application (24A1138) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 23, 2025.
  5. Apr 15 2025
    Application (24A1138) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 24, 2025 to August 23, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.