Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Latisha Anderson v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 23-4109 · judgment November 8, 2024
Certiorari denied · January 20, 2026
Question presented
I. THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION FINDING NO PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT OR NO IMPROPER INTERFERENCE BY THE DISTRICT COURT IS CONTRARY TO THE FIFTH AMENDMENT’S DUE PROCESS CLAUSE FOR IT DEPRIVES PETITIONER OF LIBERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS BY OPEN AND NOTORIOUS MANIPULATION OF THE TRIAL AND SENTENCING PROCESS. II. THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION IS CONTRARY TO THE SIXTH AMENDMENT, WHICH REQUIRES DEFENDANTS TO HAVE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Denzil H. Forrester
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Linked docket
25M20
Proceedings
- Jan 20 2026Petition DENIED.
- Dec 31 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
- Dec 29 2025Reply of petitioner Latisha Anderson filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 17 2025Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
- Nov 18 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 17, 2025.
- Nov 14 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 17, 2025 to December 17, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 14 2025Motion (25M20) Granted.
- Sep 17 2025Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
- Jul 01 2025Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
- Jul 01 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2025)