Angel E. Gaston v. City of Leesburg, Florida, et al.

i^CotO goVefAnnent deFendoAhSy ufthovtayc^nst o< respoAcboj -the Conn^o<H/ (eet Abe WJen oP ^°°P tW they uoovxU We cdVesM the \a gW fbttk CegtxTcLUss op their CetxWWy w(w5 Forth. PWnHFP’ eXeTcvSinj hB /)merJme<nt r^va- to excess Ws fr<o^h ^4^0 Je^nstr^ Stovt" H>eiv ^bVce de^art(YieAt? i)0oe5 the Court W He diScfeW to KoiJ He 11.5, Buffed Court5 CxAioj jQ CCtk^firJ~£'l V, Bo Woo by \xsinj the P/-$A Cevlevi to iocf€Ck5e the bvfckn of pccof peC the pWnHWP ^n$0Aef ot the )Wrc4 oP St&hnj do^on (o^joy/e the 6-fantxd In the "MocnbFy Test) by re^'i<tnj the VVmaViPP ^Ktsoner <\gP yW to 5ttte <x cbm pf a. cnGclicioKAS SetectWe ^Dccecnmt CeRVoMon fcr He exercise ks AcoenWeot r^hts "io a ^poctancJ plain sHfepent' ^'vKSma to We cAso cepnrincj exo acqumcrvH P ,r"M Mb novyst Wle dv ^-3^ V> overcome WcW<U aOwa+i/e Matte, oV gooA artuoWe Co-vAe.? Wk VO^A PLf^toW A gww^enf (Wcknfe by il V taAV T^£ Cau^e -fo AefenAxnts tor KYwvtny vukh> a\sa n/U- nie W<Aoas 0? (prof ><\ Sck^cr y, Co^r* WW W fev;eu) fcr kW O'6Sl J