Robin Emanuel Hammock v. Michigan

<x\tAe5 W OXK OdioW U/^OI5 he JiteA ex Accord CoyxVicYo* E>C SXeV.d ^AAweivb fo^-cxS Cv fcxcAl VioUU^ Hxt 5UK Soiw^A axta^Wl uj’A^s&h^CAcWlZKW Cou(\ cA A??tA\s Xs^ut^ ex VeKE^oKi KmRNO CrttvA CckA Yo ^E^^ine VXeUxV uvx&a |Am.5o3C0X C<cu\ CnoA bevEX'KxvfxtA XW <XC\K (X<\ CXckEV XW^XtOG HoVuX\ W fre-Uv trorA 3uX^<\UXW ^\E UW Ki CH V\o\K KoC WocxS^cAXo’A OMW tAcKVcV. ^. SoU W>Xv(\5 W Cx Vxt^EOWEiK Uh<Xtf KW ftESTudAcuku ck\So Uxuj cA Yht. ease fcocVoGAE.'TW PcocsWe^ oK^ VV^ c5e MbXO oxA AdtixuN UnCo^’AuY\o^u.(Ciu€ KoL^CeaoAL YroWeWb UJiU PfeSeA Wt %uES\a'AS VjeUx)Sl KAoec CViAcnee vcsxs ^scertasA (X\ Vo^ Ld^kkl^ Ex/A^o^ Wenvc^ VWk\ VqAVyu ' esXAaVs^s VaA Ws Co^xhcX^s Me Ut\Co<\SVAoVocux.Ox\XeY US Cj^sX fttA^scVlSl. T- 0\k tA\c\A^x Ciwto Le^W P\u(\ e^oc W XHoXc^A ^V^iwdts V\XG>XaS Vf WEVuSWtr \o E-^Vo^CE. llMtfA VrmL OVsEXK GPWI-X^ KvMa«w.oC<S csecuc^ KkA\ow Pv^a FcoXA eSAStc\ET\X~l"n ■H-. fc^niuVte^^ Citw'X CooA <a\S<x^M 44 S^fcMiots toil i*to.W»o\V/ SA^kovAs SsA l«A\x <<v fctobtl V- tWIlarA ^Vt\e 1_£P>^ tieWVue V'ex Cj>st CjrtAttsseo oA aoii PtfAtotwicVio'rt -h> SuWtiS'i^i tAiAt'.XtA tM'AeN-t. . ’ sc, Qos r«.«M^oi.K X^<X 'CWE. Soless c^ ck A<;<A ocW UnJrtA. SAVE'S Co<^X.\o\<jA ArfttxxWtA Xe.wXte-A'fi V<\e