Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ricky Joe Bland v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-5176


Certiorari denied · November 17, 2025

Question presented

This Petition asks this Court to resolve a split among the federal circuit courts on a question of federal criminal sentencing procedure. If a criminal defendant receives a term of supervised release, the district court will specify the conditions that the defendant must follow. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583. As part of supervised release, a defendant must receive “a drug test within 15 days of release on supervised release and at least 2 periodic drug tests thereafter (as determined by the court) for use of a controlled substance.” 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). A plurality of the Circuits holds that statute requires that the district court judge determine the number and/or frequency of any drug tests that the defendant will face while on supervised release, regardless of whether the testing is imposed as a special condition or mandatory condition of supervised release. The Sixth Circuit below, however, believed that the district court could delegate the frequency of drug testing to the probation officer when the testing is ordered as a special condition of supervised release. To resolve the split, this Petition asks the Court to decide the following question: 1. Did the district court below err in imposing as a special condition of supervised release a requirement that “[t]he defendant… participate in a program of testing and/or treatment for drug…abuse, as directed by the probation officer, until such time as the defendant is released from the program by the probation officer.”

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Howard Walton Anderson III
Truluck Thomason LLC

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Nov 17 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 30 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
  3. Oct 28 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Sep 30 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2025)