In Re David C. White

1 2 QUESTIONS[S] PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 3 Q(x) 4 1. Shall any hydroelectric dam be removed in the United States without 5 express consent of Congress, when the simple, scientific solution is 6 dam maintenance to include dredging to remove contaminated silt, 7 heat-scrubbing toxins, installing or repairing fish ladders, and 8 retrofitting for earthquake if needed? 9 10 2. Shall U.S. Courts persist in extreme bias against pro se or any litigant, 11 contrary to Loper Bright, especially in use of Administrative Law to 12 nullify Federal Law for Summary Judgment, by dismissing a case as 13 frivolous when defense fails to Appear, in collusion for obstruction of 14 justice? 15 16 3. Shall a judge who dismisses a case when Defense fails to Appear be 17 guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the felonies admitted by 18 abandonment of the Defense, and then doing nothing to adjudicate 19 them, in defiance of Loper Bright? 20 21 4. Shall the Circuit Court of Appeals violate its protocol for selecting a 22 unique panel of judges for each case tried when a litigant has 23 simultaneously presented two or more unique cases for review? 24 25 5. Shall “good behavior” in Article III, Section 1 be defined in part by 26 compliance with Federal Rules, Federal Laws and the U.S. Constitution 27 itself. 28 29 6. Shall the Circuit Court of Appeals refer a PETITION FOR 30 RECONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITIVE ORDER to the same panel of 31 judges whose extreme bias in dismissing that very case is being 32 challenged by pro se, or any litigants? 33 34 7. Shall any Court dismiss a Complaint as frivolous when Defendants are 35 in default by the 21+1 day FRCP rule or have otherwise made public 36 confession of a crime such as killing hundreds of endangered fish? 37 38 *