Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Lorene Chittenden v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 25-6232 · judgment June 26, 2025


Certiorari denied · November 10, 2025

Question presented

In People v. Weeks 498 P. 142, 2021 CO 75, the court interpreted the restitution statute, 18-1.3-603, C.R.S. (2021). The court concluded that the restitution deadline may be extended only if, before the deadline expires, the court expressly finds good cause for doing so. It follows that neither a request for more time to determine the proposed amount of restitution nor an order granting such a request justifies extending the prosecution's deadline in subsection (2) or the court's deadline in subsection (1 )(b). The question presented is this: Should the fourth circuit ruling that Chittenden did not file a timely appeal apply since there has been an intervening change in the law recognizing an issue that was not previously available? Holland. 181 F. 3d 597, 605-06.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lorene Chittenden

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Nov 10 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 09 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
  3. Oct 07 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Sep 26 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2025)