In Re Jody M. Johnson

C) Should -Wit'S l).S, Supreme. Couri grant \A/riV of Habeas Corpus petition,where the U.S Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred tn denying Peti ti'oncr’s claim of this Courts xk ftETKOACTIVE"case of gossip V'Oklchomc^lHS 5,64,612^22) L,Ed,^d 9OC2o2sY/* /Vapue violation*? the prosecution’s failed to correct false Westi mony?and had a constitutional obligation to correct false testimony under h/apue \Z T//in/oS 360 U.S. 26t793i Z~,Ed 2d 12/7,79 S,Ct II73CI9S71 Also »n accordance uuifh the" Antiterror ism qnd Effective £>eqth Penalty Act7' q$ codified at *28 U.S.C, §22tHCb),C2^ CAi fl Or 2> Should this U.S Supreme Court gran\ VVrit of H^eeS Corpus peti tt'on, where tke-US. Elevcnfln Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Peti t ion ert claim of finis count’s controlling u ruling" case in McQuiggi a V. Perki n$, 5T69 U.S. 3 83,1 33 S Ct, \92H ISSL. Ed, 2d 1019/2013 U5. LEXIS 4068^81 US. L.V/.H327, 82 IU-.R. F^d.^d FU.t.Weekly Fed. S213, M e re Actual innocence *miscarria^£ of iyosTict held fo be CSchulp') gateway through cuhuh sW prisoner petitioning for federal habeas corpus relief might pass. These are conflicts c^ith this Courts rulings, and p€fifioner’s □-$ Const, Amend, 5^ NhK rights are