Jamiel Johnson v. Pennsylvania

Q 4i?e bi +le <WeAesfe t^sKae V PeW^vA slVe ^osVeofcvVdn c©uV iVRCobsK+iAi <>taW y <$e\n-a#. Pe^i V d^ * fa V[o\ ^\di £ 2) <4 C b of'Fhe eofcsvcfer PVA^vA uVi'meVy^VoF w<$4~ crp- subject fr?^W jtJ(bis4ieWk) jU^ie^l fi <b C^^5>) ^^ifeeffeAw ^S^ce ©FcoUVSeWAlesb^^ /Z£efcVe|?ce( n?4U 4V ' ; h?l 6 ® ^e^Aft^ev^eCca^Wr C^) t>it^Pe'Vl'KofefeV^s s^re aoU.VT— ^tyo\rt^e^<?oHbSe\ ^Lv^l-^MeSTee^l've Assisi* Atoe cF e_oansei a\4tKe czF'Hie Awr4° ~Ue U.£ CovAiViw^ ~ +^Z/s^Veh?eZ/ J 4A?e ^V<$ - Av4icl^ $2) vAet? V?e ikbVe^di^Uey c^eAfae^^^ec^^^esfaVe Coupes ''Uck^Si^e^hR^WeVj^^ sefrVetoce-fte ^V&oV-et' Ao 4 Vrfe vvPAUaA^^ef yVisoft -f^'Ak WiuMep-eo^VicAo^ A^WeVet§ 1\i 4V A-f^VM^Ve &e\cM U^s^n <ne4j«4ieebX SU uZ^Z V(T # C°Zt ^o^e "sebUoe ul fX -hoheV) ib (VS-ZZ SUPRhMM^oPA^ L) oF^eX Lwsht^oV 7 Ar^^Tv^e X-ff^K'e gJoW. 53Me'\ettZ MW&jeSttZ <MMqi’o|!/ HUS) Viotete He SUPteMA^-^e U£ <Wi-Wr; by 'Al-he^S^i?] GM -P^A- Su^s®j> AMsVteP. ftS( iw&couRr? "Wr