Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jeremy Baum v. Missouri
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, No. WD85148 · judgment March 4, 2025
Question presented
Whether affirming a criminal conviction on a different theory than what was presented to the jury conflicts with this Court’s holdings in Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196, 202 (1948); Presnell v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 14, 16 (1978); Dunn v. United States, 442 U.S. 100, 106 (1979); Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222, 236 (1980); McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257, 270 n. 8 (1991); and, Ciminelli v. United States, 598 U.S. 306, 316-17 (2023), which specifically prohibit a reviewing court from affirming a conviction on a different theory than what was presented to the jury, and thus violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Christopher Egan
Missouri State Public Defender
For respondent
Evan Joseph Buchheim
Atty Gen. of Missouri
Proceedings
- Nov 17 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 30 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
- Oct 27 2025Waiver of right of respondent State of Missouri to respond filed.
- Sep 11 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 27, 2025)
- Aug 11 2025Application (25A145) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 24, 2025.
- Jul 25 2025Application (25A145) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 25, 2025 to September 24, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.