Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jeremy Baum v. Missouri

IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, No. WD85148 · judgment March 4, 2025


Certiorari denied · November 17, 2025

Question presented

Whether affirming a criminal conviction on a different theory than what was presented to the jury conflicts with this Court’s holdings in Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196, 202 (1948); Presnell v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 14, 16 (1978); Dunn v. United States, 442 U.S. 100, 106 (1979); Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222, 236 (1980); McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257, 270 n. 8 (1991); and, Ciminelli v. United States, 598 U.S. 306, 316-17 (2023), which specifically prohibit a reviewing court from affirming a conviction on a different theory than what was presented to the jury, and thus violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
James Christopher Egan
Missouri State Public Defender

For respondent
Evan Joseph Buchheim
Atty Gen. of Missouri

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A145

Proceedings

  1. Nov 17 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 30 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
  3. Oct 27 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent State of Missouri to respond filed.
  4. Sep 11 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 27, 2025)
  5. Aug 11 2025
    Application (25A145) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 24, 2025.
  6. Jul 25 2025
    Application (25A145) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 25, 2025 to September 24, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.