Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Linda Kay Twigg v. Allan Lee Twigg
IFP petition · Appellate Court of Maryland, No. 2180 · judgment January 16, 2025
Questions presented
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg at Allegany Court House make the false accusation that our thirty-five-year-old daughter is the product of infidelity or that we have a son, and why did the Appellate and Supreme Court of Maryland deny the confirmed concrete medical evidence?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg state I committed adultery after I clearly specified in their repulsive deposition that I never committed adultery and did not over our entire thirty-two years of marriage?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg admit an appraisal from 2019 on our home, but deny a validated and current appraisal from 2022?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg not order the property sold and distribute the proceeds?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg spell the defendants' names incorrectly on our divorce decree?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg document we divorced May 4th-2021, when we were clearly at the Allegany County Court House for a fifteen-minute divorce on May 3rd, 2021 ?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg order the plaintiff to pay Crawford Credits in the judgment order after we had supposedly been divorced for twenty months?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg award $3,000.00 half of what my eleven year-old car was worth to the defendant even when he was aware that it was inoperable at the time?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg deny plaintiffs evidence of adultery?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg state that the parties “agreed” that the value of the property was $253,500.00 after an appraisal was performed and valued at $394,000.00 in 2022 then denied, stating it was hearsay?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg deny evidence stating the mortgage was also paid through plaintiff’s account at Chessie Federal Credit Union and not just through BB&T?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg hold plaintiff accountable for the $2,000.00 that I withdrew from an account with my name prior to divorce?
-
Why did Judge Michael Twigg admit defendants word on the values of our property, cattle, camper and Kubota tractor and deny plaintiff’s concrete evidence, he stated it was hearsay and that we were already divorced and could not accept new evidence to dispute property but accepted an
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Linda Kay Twigg
For respondent
Stephen C. Wilkinson
Stephen C. Wilkinon, LLC
Proceedings
- Apr 20 2026Petition DENIED.
- Mar 26 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
- Feb 25 2026Petitioner complied with order.
- Jan 12 2026Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
- Jan 05 2026Application (25A627) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 1, 2026.
- Dec 16 2025Application (25A627) to extend further the time from January 30, 2026 to March 1, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
- Dec 03 2025Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
- Dec 02 2025Application (25A627) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 30, 2026.
- Nov 24 2025Application (25A627) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of an extension of time within which to comply, submitted to The Chief Justice.
- Nov 24 2025Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
- Nov 10 2025The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 1, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
- Oct 23 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Oct 02 2025Waiver of right of respondent Allan Lee Twigg to respond filed.
- Jul 23 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 20, 2025)